U2 Win Legal Victory In Copyright Lawsuit
. ![]()
(Radio.com) A U.S. District Court judge has determined that U2 did not violate copyright laws with their song "The Fly" from the 1991 album Achtung Baby. English musician Paul Rose had filed suit against U2, claiming his song "Nae Slappin" inspired a 12-second segment of "The Fly" and sought damages from U2 and Universal Music Group. The judge dismissed the case, noting that similarities between "The Fly" and "Nae Slappin" were not "qualitatively significant," reports Billboard. In his suit, Rose claimed he sent a demo tape to UMG between 1989 and the release of Achtung Baby. The experimental musician said the guitar line, bass line and percussion U2 used in "The Fly" mimicked his demo, as did the band's chord shifts from E7 to A7. More broadly, he claimed "The Fly" shares a "dimension of sound" with "Nae Slappin." Judge Denise Cote determined that only six percent of Rose's track shares elements with the U2 song. That "fragment," she wrote, bears little significance to "The Fly" as a whole. "The fragment appears only once near the beginning of the recording; it is not repeated," she wrote. "It is one of multiple, at times seemingly random, guitar lines and styles strung together over the course of the composition." Read more here. Radio.com is an official news provider for antiMusic.com. |
Live from Celebrity Theatre: Graham Nash
Have a Happy 4/20 With These Smoking Accessories
Live: Michael Monroe and Donnie Vie Rock Chicago
On The Record: Collective Soul, A Day To Remember And More
Punk Icons Rock Beatles Classics
Wolves at the Gate Unleash 'Law Of The [Waste] Land' Visualizer
Sleep Habits Previews New EP With 'Antique Mall' Video
South Jersey Pop Punkers FRND CRCL Deliver 'Nice Guy'
Marilyn Manson Takes On Phil Collins Classic 'In The Air Tonight'
Puddle of Mudd Announce New Album With 'Beautimous'
Bad Religion, Pennywise Lead Punk In The Park Worcester Lineup
Superheaven Return With Frist New Album in 10 Years